A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-March/117491.html below:

[Python-Dev] im_func: implementation detail?

[Python-Dev] im_func: implementation detail? [Python-Dev] im_func: implementation detail?Guido van Rossum guido at python.org
Sun Mar 11 21:53:31 CET 2012
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Ethan Furman <ethan at stoneleaf.us> wrote:
> How does someone know if something in CPython is an implementation detail or
> not?

Sadly, there's a large grey area where the language reference doesn't
have enough rigor, so asking here is often the only way.

> In the case of im_func, I think it is (an implementation detail), and
> another person thinks it is part of the language spec.  That all
> implementations must have.

It's part of the language spec. However it's now called __func__.

-- 
--Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4