On 2012-03-01, at 9:31 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote: > That sounds *very* far-fetched. You're pretty much designing a new > language variant. It's not an argument for burdening the original Yeah, that's what we do ;) > You should be able to prototype what you want using an advisory > subclass (if you subclass dict and add __slots__=[] to it, it will > cost very little overhead) or using a custom extension that implements > the flavor of frozendict that works best for you -- given that you're > already using greenlets, another extension can't be a bid burden. I understand. The only reason I wrote about it is to give an idea of how frozendicts may be used besides just sandboxing. I'm not strongly advocating for it, though. - Yury
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4