On Thu, 28 Jun 2012 16:16:45 +0300 Petri Lehtinen <petri at digip.org> wrote: > Antoine Pitrou wrote: > > > If messages were only added, a new file is no longer created and > > > renamed over the old file when flush() is called on an mbox, MMDF or > > > Babyl mailbox. > > > > Why so? Appending is not atomic and, if it fails in the middle, you > > could get a corrupt mbox file. > > Furthermore, I disagree that it's a bugfix: IMO it should wait for 3.4. > > The code previosly already appended messages to the end of the file > when calling add(). This patch just changed it to not do a full > rewrite when flush() is called. Ok, I agree it sounds good then. Thanks for explaining. Regards Antoine.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4