Le dimanche 24 juin 2012 à 15:51 -0400, PJ Eby a écrit : > > I don't really want to spread the idea that they're faster, either: > the exact same benchmark can probably be made to turn out differently > if you have, say, a hundred unzipped eggs on sys.path after the > benchmark directory. Yes, the case where sys.path is long (thanks to setuptools) is precisely what I was thinking about. > A more realistic benchmark would import more than one module, > though... Indeed. > That's what I meant by "lost in the noise": the outcome of the > benchmark depends on which of many potentially-plausible setups and > applications you choose to use as your basis for measurement, Should we forget to care about performance, just because different setups might yield different results? That's a rather unconstructive attitude. Regards Antoine.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4