On 2012-06-22, at 4:58 PM, Ethan Furman wrote:
> That looks strange to me -- I suggest putting brackets around each one, like:
>
> replace(*, [name=<optional>,] [kind=<optional>,] [default=<optional>,] [annotation=<optional>]) -> Parameter
Isn't it too much? The PEP clearly indicates '=<optional>' is just
a notation for an optional parameter.
If it's that much of an issue - We can use '=_void' instead, as it is
in the implementation, and describe how it works. But that's just noise,
that will distract the reader from the PEP.
> which is still a bit noisy. At the risk of raising the ire of those who don't condone the use of '...' :) how about:
>
> replace(*, [name=...,] [kind=...,] [default=...,] [annotation=...]
> ) -> Parameter
That may confuse someone, as ... - Ellipsis is a legitimate object
to be used as a default value or annotation:
def foo(bar:...=...)->...:
pass
I'd keep it simple ;)
-
Yury
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4