On 06/22/2012 11:21 AM, MRAB wrote: > On 22/06/2012 17:39, Terry Reedy wrote: >> You sensibly only test printable ascii chars, which are in the >> contiguous range 32 to 127 inclusive. So it makes no sense to claim >> otherwise and then deny the wrong claim, or to enlarge the range and >> then shrink it again. > ASCII character 127 is a control character, not a printable character. > >>> + This function brute-force tests all** ASCII characters (1 >>> to 127 >>> + inclusive) as format units, checking to see that >> > There are 128 ASCII characters (0 to 127 inclusive). Okay, message received. I'll test from 32 to 126 inclusive. I'm going to be obnoxious and code those values straight in--which I concede will be a maintenance nightmare should the ASCII standard change. //arry/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20120622/283eb5bf/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4