RetroSearch Browse

Fri Jun 22 18:56:41 CEST 2012 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-June/120643.html

On Friday, June 22, 2012 at 12:54 PM, Alexandre Zani wrote:
> 
> Key distribution is the real issue though. If there isn't a key
> distribution infrastructure in place, we might as well not bother with
> signatures. PyPI could issue x509 certs to packagers. You wouldn't be
> able to verify that the name given is accurate, but you would be able
> to verify that all packages with the same listed author are actually
> by that author.
> 
> 

I've been sketching out ideas for key distribution, but it's very much
a chicken and egg problem, very few people sign their packages (because
nothing uses it currently), and nobody is motivated to work on infrastructure
or tooling because no one signs their packages. 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20120622/8c1c3fdf/attachment.html>

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-June/120643.html below:

[Python-Dev] Signed packages