On 6/20/12 2:53 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote: > On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 9:31 PM, Tarek Ziadé<tarek at ziade.org> wrote: >> Yeah maybe this subset could be left in 3.3 >> >> and we'd remove packaging-the-installer part (pysetup, commands, compilers) >> >> I think it's a good idea ! > OK, to turn this into a concrete suggestion based on the packaging docs. > Declare stable, include in 3.3 > ------------------------------------------ > packaging.version — Version number classes > packaging.metadata — Metadata handling > packaging.markers — Environment markers > packaging.database — Database of installed distributions I think that's a good subset. +1 on all of the things you said after If you succeed on getting the sci people working on "PEP: Distutils replacement: Compiling Extension Modules" it will be a big win.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4