RetroSearch Browse

Wed Jun 20 12:34:12 CEST 2012 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-June/120476.html

On 6/20/12 11:54 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 09:51:03 +0000 (UTC)
> Vinay Sajip<vinay_sajip at yahoo.co.uk>  wrote:
>> Antoine Pitrou<solipsis<at>  pitrou.net>  writes:
>>
>>> Deciding to remove packaging from 3.3 is another instance of the same
>>> mistake, IMO.
>>>
>> What's the rationale for leaving it in, when it's known to be
>> incomplete/unfinished?
> As an incentive for users to start using the features that are
> finished enough, and exercise the migration path from distutils.
> The module can be marked "provisional" so as to allow further API
> variations.
It's true that some modules are quite mature and already useful:

- packaging.version     (PEP 386)
- packaging.pypi
- packaging.metadata  (PEP 345)
- packaging.database   (PEP 386)

the part that is not ready is the installer and some setuptools bridging


>
> Regards
>
> Antoine.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/ziade.tarek%40gmail.com

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-June/120476.html below:

[Python-Dev] Status of packaging in 3.3