On 06/19/2012 05:46 PM, Éric Araujo wrote: > Hi all, > > We need to make a decision about the packaging module in Python 3.3. > Please read this message and breathe deeply before replying :) ... > With beta coming, a way to deal with that unfortunate situation needs to > be found. We could (a) grant an exception to packaging to allow changes > after beta1; (b) keep packaging as it is now under a provisional status, > with due warnings that many things are expected to change; (c) remove > the unstable parts and deliver a subset that works (proposed by Tarek to > the Pyramid author on distutils-sig); (d) not release packaging as part > of Python 3.3 (I think that was also suggested on distutils-sig last > month). I think it'd be very wise to choose (d) here. We've lived so long without a credible packaging story that waiting one (or even two) more major release cycles isn't going to make a huge difference in the long run but including a version of packaging now which gets fixed in a rush would probably end up muddying the already dark waters of Python software distribution. - C
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4