On 17.06.2012 22:41, Guido van Rossum wrote: > Would it make sense to detect and reject these in 3.3 if the 2.7 syntax > is used? Maybe we are talking about different things: The (new) proposal is that the ur prefix in 3.3 is a syntax error (again, as it was before PEP 414). So, yes: the raw unicode literals will be rejected (not by explicitly detecting them, though). Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4