RetroSearch Browse

Fri Jun 15 21:04:53 CEST 2012 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-June/120300.html

On 06/15/2012 11:46 AM, R. David Murray wrote:
> Adding a os.have_openat seems more reasonable than adding is_implemented
> to every __signature__ object.  And more useful, as well; it provides
> a much more specific piece of information.

We already have "os.have_openat"; it's spelled 
sysconfig.get_config_var('HAVE_OPENAT').  But, assuming I land issue 
14626, this leads us to:

    Q: Can I use the dir_fd parameter to os.open?
    A: Only if sysconfig.get_config_var('HAVE_OPENAT') is true.

    Q: Can I use the fd parameter to os.utime?
    A: Only if sysconfig.get_config_var('HAVE_FUTIMENS') or
    sysconfig.get_config_var('HAVE_FUTIMES') is true.

I feel this interface lacks civility.

//arry/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20120615/37ae015c/attachment.html>

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-June/120300.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 362 Third Revision