On 06/15/2012 04:32 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote: > Since I don't believe your proposed flag will answer any question that > actually matters in practice, I consider it useless noise that should > be dropped from the proposal. I can cite a situation where it matters in practice: the implementation of os.fwalk is effectively gated on hasattr(posix, "openat"). I expect to remove openat() in favor of adding a dir_fd parameter to open (see issue 14626). > Now, what a function *could* do is set __signature__ to a Signature > subclass that provided an additional "validate()" method, or provided > arbitrary additional information about supported features. That's a > perfectly reasonable option. What would the validate() function for os.close do? //arry/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20120615/fd44e194/attachment-0001.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4