Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-June/120183.html below:

[Python-Dev] #12982: Should -O be required to *read* .pyo files?

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] #12982: Should -O be required to *read* .pyo files?
• Next message: [Python-Dev] #12982: Should -O be required to *read* .pyo files?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 6/13/2012 2:46 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:

> Not only docstrings, but also asserts. I think running a pyo without -O
> would be a bug.

That cat is already out of the bag ;-)
People are doing that now by renaming x.pyo to x.pyc.
Brett claims that it is also easy to do in 3.3 with a custom importer.

-- 
Terry Jan Reedy

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] #12982: Should -O be required to *read* .pyo files?
• Next message: [Python-Dev] #12982: Should -O be required to *read* .pyo files?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4