Nick Coghlan wrote: > On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 8:38 AM, Steven D'Aprano <steve at pearwood.info> wrote: >> Brett Cannon wrote: >>> This is also Python, the language that assumes everyone is an consenting >>> adult. >> >> Exactly, which is why I'm not asking for __signature__ to be immutable. Who >> knows, despite Larry's skepticism (and mine!), perhaps there is a use-case >> for __signature__ being modified that we haven't thought of yet. >> But that's not really the point. It may be that nobody will be stupid enough >> to mangle __signature__, and inspect.getfullargspec becomes redundant. > > I've presented use cases for doing this already. Please stop calling me stupid. I'm sorry Nick, I missed your email and my choice of words was poor. Please accept my apologies. -- Steven
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4