On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 7:11 PM, Greg Ewing <greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz> wrote: > What would be so bad about giving datetime objects > a DST flag? Apps that don't care could ignore it and > get results no worse than the status quo. This would neatly solve the round-trip problem, but will open a different can of worms: what happens to the dst flag when you add a timedelta? If dst flag is optional, should you be able to compare dst-aware and dst-naive instances?
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4