RetroSearch Browse

Tue Jun 5 23:31:15 CEST 2012 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-June/119938.html

On 6/5/2012 2:26 PM, PJ Eby wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Terry Reedy <tjreedy at udel.edu
> <mailto:tjreedy at udel.edu>> wrote:

>     I think you should just store the decorators in the correct order of use
>     +        __decorators__ = [deco1, deco2]
>     and avoid the nonsense (time-waste) of making an indirect copy via
>     list_iterator and reversing it each time the attribute is used.
>
>
> It's for symmetry and straightforward translation with stacked
> decorators, i.e. between:
>
> @deco1
> @deco2
> [declaration]
>
> and __decorators__ = [deco1, deco2]
>
> Doing it the other way now means a different order for people to
> remember; there should be One Obvious Order for decorators, and the one
> we have now is it.

You and I have different ideas of 'obvious' in this context. But since 
you will use this and and me probably not, let your idea rule.

-- 
Terry Jan Reedy

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-June/119938.html below:

[Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] peps: Add PEP 422: Dynamic Class Decorators