A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-June/119828.html below:

[Python-Dev] Python 3.3 on Windows 2000

[Python-Dev] Python 3.3 on Windows 2000 [Python-Dev] Python 3.3 on Windows 2000"Martin v. Löwis" martin at v.loewis.de
Sun Jun 3 17:32:13 CEST 2012
It seems that by moving to VS 2010, we have killed Windows 2000 support,
for the same reason VS 2012 would kill XP support: Windows 2000
apparently won't recognize the .exe files as executables anymore.
I haven't actually tested this: can somebody please confirm?

A year ago, Brian put a statement into PEP 11 that 3.3 would support
Windows 2000 still, but with a warning. Under my recent PEP change,
Windows 2000 does not need to be supported anymore since 13.07.2010,
when Microsoft's extended support expired.

So I propose to just remove the claim from the PEP that 3.3 would
still be supported, and not go through any notification period.

Objections?

As a consequence, we could then change some of the deferred-loading
stuff for "new" (i.e. XP+) API into proper linking.

Regards,
Martin
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4