Looks good to me, so accepted. But why isn't it visible on python.org/dev/peps/ yet? On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 7:37 PM, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote: > I'll pronounce. Give me a few days. > > On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 10:05 AM, Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor at gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > The discussion on PEP 0424 seems to have subsided (and I haven't gotten > angry > > emails in a week!). So I would like to request a BDFL or BDFP > pronouncement > > on PEP 0424, text available here: > http://hg.python.org/peps/file/tip/pep-0424.txt > > -- > --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido <http://python.org/%7Eguido>) > -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20120728/8d5d03f8/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4