A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-July/121101.html below:

[Python-Dev] Doc/ACKS and Misc/ACKS

[Python-Dev] Doc/ACKS and Misc/ACKS [Python-Dev] Doc/ACKS and Misc/ACKSBrian Curtin brian at python.org
Mon Jul 23 20:32:02 CEST 2012
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Jesus Cea <jcea at jcea.es> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 23/07/12 19:30, Eli Bendersky wrote:
>>> That said, we could probably merge Doc/ACKS and Misc/ACKS (*).
>>> There doesn't seem to be any strong argument for separating doc
>>> contributions from other contributions.
>>>
>>> (*) I think perhaps Éric already proposed it at some point
>>>
>>
>> +1
>
> +1 too.

Before everyone else on the list just writes a two character "+1"
response, can we just assume that if you don't speak up, you're ok
with it?

Especially when it's about an ack file...
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4