On Jul 18, 2012, at 3:30 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote: > - Eugene Toder's patch to add an AST optimisation step to the compiler > chain (http://bugs.python.org/issue11549) (I've asked Eugene about > this patch more recently and his current thought is that subsequent > improvements to the peephole optimisation have rendered it less > valuable. However, the patch is still a potentially useful resource > for anyone investigating bytecode optimisation ideas) +1 for furthering Eugene's patch. The AST is the correct place to do some of the optimizations currently done by the peepholer. Raymond -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20120720/868501e8/attachment-0001.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4