Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-July/121018.html below:

[Python-Dev] A new JIT compiler for a faster CPython?

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] A new JIT compiler for a faster CPython?
• Next message: [Python-Dev] A new JIT compiler for a faster CPython?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> What is the status of LLVM nowadays? Is it not a good solution to
> write a portable JIT?

I don't think it is. It is still slow and memory hungry. The fact that
the version that Apple ships with Xcode still miscompiles Python 3.3
tells me that it is still buggy.

> I don't want to write my own library to generate machine code.

I plan to use nanojit.

Regards,
Martin

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] A new JIT compiler for a faster CPython?
• Next message: [Python-Dev] A new JIT compiler for a faster CPython?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4