A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-July/121001.html below:

[Python-Dev] A new JIT compiler for a faster CPython?

[Python-Dev] A new JIT compiler for a faster CPython? [Python-Dev] A new JIT compiler for a faster CPython?Victor Stinner victor.stinner at gmail.com
Wed Jul 18 00:15:53 CEST 2012
> Personally, I like the idea of having a JIT compiler more or less as an
> extension module at hand. Sort-of like a co-processor, just in software.
> Lets you run your code either interpreter or JITed, just as you need.

Me too, so something like psyco. LLVM is written in C++ and may have
license issue, so I don't really want to add a dependency to LLVM to
CPython. For an experimental project, a third party module is also
more convinient.

Victor
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4