RetroSearch Browse

Fri Jul 6 16:54:39 CEST 2012 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-July/120892.html

Le 06/07/2012 10:36, benjamin.peterson a écrit :
> http://hg.python.org/peps/rev/4dc72bbf9ed2
> changeset:   4483:4dc72bbf9ed2
> user:        Daniel Holth<dholth at fastmail.fm>
> date:        Wed Jul 04 07:30:08 2012 -0400
> summary:
>    specify Provides-Extra

Sorry, but this was premature.  The mail on distutils-sig only describes 
the syntax for a new field without any explanation of the semantics and 
use case, not the relation to the Setup-Requires and Test-Requires 
fields that we’ve been discussing for some time (and which would make 
part of the Extra proposal obsolete).  I know Alexis and I are not as 
active as other devs in mailing lists and PEPs, but these things are on 
our radar and we want to push them forward.  Please allow the discussion 
to take place before editing the packaging PEPs.

Regards

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-July/120892.html below:

[Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] peps: specify Provides-Extra