RetroSearch Browse

Sun Jan 29 23:44:53 CET 2012 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-January/115989.html

Martin v. Löwis wrote:
>> Now that issue 13703 has been largely settled,
>> I want to propose my new dictionary implementation again.
>> It is a little more polished than before.
> 
> Please clarify the status of that code: are you actually proposing
> 6a21f3b35e20 for inclusion into Python as-is? If so, please post it
> as a patch to the tracker, as it will need to be reviewed (possibly
> with requests for further changes).

I thought it already was a patch. What do I need to do to make it a patch?

> 
> If not, it would be good if you could give a list of things that need to
> be done before you consider submission to Python.

A few tests that rely on dict ordering should probably be fixed first.
I'll submit bug reports for those.

> 
> Also, please submit a contrib form if you haven't done so.

Where do I find it?

Cheers,
Mark.

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-January/115989.html below:

[Python-Dev] A new dictionary implementation