francis wrote: > On 01/29/2012 11:31 AM, Mark Shannon wrote: >> It passes all the tests. >> (I had to change a couple that relied on dict repr() ordering) > > Hi Mark, > I've cloned the repo, build it the I've tried with ./python -m test. I > got some errors: > > First in general: > 340 tests OK. > 2 tests failed: > test_dis test_gdb [snip] > > **************************************************** > then test_dis: > [snip] > ====================================================================== > FAIL: test_code_info (test.test_dis.CodeInfoTests) > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- [snip] > > ====================================================================== > FAIL: test_show_code (test.test_dis.CodeInfoTests) > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- [snip] These are known failures, the tests are at fault as they rely on dict ordering. However, they should be commented out. Probably crept back in again when I pulled the latest version of cpython -- I'll fix them now. [snip] > > ***************************************************** > For test gdb: > > Lots of output ..... > > Ran 42 tests in 11.361s > > FAILED (failures=28) > test test_gdb failed > 1 test failed: > test_gdb > [109989 refs] I still have gdb 6.somthing, would you mail me the full output please, so I can see what the problem is. Cheers, Mark.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4