Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-January/115944.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 408 -- Standard library __preview__ package

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 408 -- Standard library __preview__ package
• Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 408 -- Standard library __preview__ package
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Jan 28, 2012, at 09:15 AM, Guido van Rossum wrote:

>So I do not support the __preview__ package. I think we're better off
>flagging experimental modules in the docs than in their name. For the
>specific case of the regex module, the best way to adoption may just
>be to include it in the stdlib as regex and keep it there. Any other
>solution will just cause too much anxiety.

+1

What does the PEP give you above this "simple as possible" solution?

-Barry

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 408 -- Standard library __preview__ package
• Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 408 -- Standard library __preview__ package
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4