stefan brunthaler wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 10:36, Benjamin Peterson <benjamin at python.org> wrote: >> 2011/11/8 stefan brunthaler <s.brunthaler at uci.edu>: >>> How does that sound? >> I think I can hear real patches and benchmarks most clearly. >> > I spent the better part of my -20% time on implementing the work as > "suggested". Please find the benchmarks attached to this email, I just Could you try benchmarking with the "standard" benchmarks: http://hg.python.org/benchmarks/ and see what sort of performance gains you get? > did them on my system (i7-920, Linux 3.0.0-15, GCC 4.6.1). I branched > off the regular 3.3a0 default tip changeset 73977 shortly after your > email. I do not have an official patch yet, but am going to create one > if wanted. Changes to the existing interpreter are minimal, the > biggest chunk is a new interpreter dispatch loop. How portable is the threaded interpreter? Do you have a public repository for the code, so we can take a look? Cheers, Mark.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4