On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 5:19 PM, Benjamin Peterson <benjamin at python.org> wrote: > Hello everyone, > In effort to get a fix out before Perl 6 goes mainstream, Barry and I > have decided to pronounce on what we want for our stable releases. > What we have decided is that > 1. Simple hash randomization is the way to go. We think this has the > best chance of actually fixing the problem while being fairly > straightforward such that we're comfortable putting it in a stable > release. > 2. It will be off by default in stable releases and enabled by an > envar at runtime. This will prevent code breakage from dictionary > order changing as well as people depending on the hash stability. Okay, good call! -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4