> How so? None of the patches did, but I think it was said several times > that other types (int, tuple, float) could also be converted to use > randomized hashes. What's more, there isn't any technical difficulty in > doing so. The challenge again is about incompatibility: the more types you apply this to, the higher the risk of breaking third-party code. Plus you still risk that the hash seed might leak out of the application, opening it up again to the original attack.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4