On 27/01/2012 15:34, Benjamin Peterson wrote: > 2012/1/27 Eli Bendersky<eliben at gmail.com>: >> Criteria for "graduation" >> ------------------------- > I think you also need "Criteria for being placed in __preview__". Do > we just toss everything someone suggests in? > > And given that permanently deleting something from __preview__ would be a big deal (deciding it didn't make the grade and should never graduate), the criteria shouldn't be much less strict than for adopting a package into the standard library. i.e. once something gets into __preview__ people are going to assume it will graduate at some point - __preview__ is a place for apis to stabilise and mature, not a place for dubious libraries that we may or may not want in the standard library at some point. Michael -- http://www.voidspace.org.uk/ May you do good and not evil May you find forgiveness for yourself and forgive others May you share freely, never taking more than you give. -- the sqlite blessing http://www.sqlite.org/different.html
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4