Lennart Regebro writes: > On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 06:02, Paul McMillan <paul at mcmillan.ws> wrote: > >> We may use a different salt per dictionary. > > > > If we're willing to re-hash everything on a per-dictionary basis. That > > doesn't seem reasonable given our existing usage. > > Well, if we get crazy amounts of collisions, re-hashing with a new > salt to get rid of those collisions seems quite reasonable to me... But doesn't the whole idea of a hash table fall flat on its face if you need to worry about crazy amounts of collisions (outside of deliberate attacks)?
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4