Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-January/115707.html below:

[Python-Dev] Hashing proposal: change only string-only dicts

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Hashing proposal: change only string-only dicts
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Hashing proposal: change only string-only dicts
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 01/18/2012 06:55 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
> I was thinking about adding the field at the end,

Will this make all strings larger, or only those that create dict 
collisions?  Making all strings larger to fix this issue sounds like a 
really bad idea.

Also, would it be acceptable to simply not cache the alternate hash? 
The cached string hash is an optimization anyway.

Hrvoje

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Hashing proposal: change only string-only dicts
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Hashing proposal: change only string-only dicts
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4