On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 01:06:07 +1000 Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 2:31 PM, <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote: > > results for 12de1ad1cee8 on branch "default" > > -------------------------------------------- > > > > test_capi leaked [2008, 2008, 2008] references, sum=6024 > > Yikes, you weren't kidding about that new subinterpreter code > execution test upsetting the refleak detection... Well, these are real leaks, but I expect them to be quite difficult to track (I've found a couple of them), because they can be scattered around in C module initialization routines and the like. I suggest we skip this test on refleak runs. cheers Antoine.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4