A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-January/115615.html below:

[Python-Dev] Status of the fix for the hash collision vulnerability

[Python-Dev] Status of the fix for the hash collision vulnerability [Python-Dev] Status of the fix for the hash collision vulnerabilityVictor Stinner victor.stinner at haypocalc.com
Wed Jan 18 10:54:26 CET 2012
2012/1/18 "Martin v. Löwis" <martin at v.loewis.de>:
> For 3.3 onwards, I'm skeptical whether all this configuration support is
> really necessary. I think a much smaller patch which leaves no choice
> would be more appropriate.

The configuration helps unit testing: see changes on Lib/test/*.py in
my last patch. I hesitate to say that the configuration is required
for tests. Anyway, users upgrading from Python 3.2 to 3.3 may need to
keep the same hash function and don't care of security (e.g. programs
running locally with trusted data).

Victor
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4