On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote: > Under the proposed scheme, there would be two kinds of feature > versions (sometimes dubbed "minor versions", for example 3.2 or 3.3): > normal feature versions and long-term support (LTS) versions. ... > A new feature version would be released every X months. We > tentatively propose X = 6 months. > > LTS versions would be one out of N feature versions. We tentatively > propose N = 4. It sounds like every six months we would get a new feature version, with every fourth one an LTS release. That sounds great, but, unless I've misunderstood, there has been a strong desire to keep that number to one digit. It doesn't matter to me all that much. However, if there is such a limit, implied or explicit, it should be mentioned and factor into the PEP. That aside, +1. -eric
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4