Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-January/115406.html below:

[Python-Dev] usefulness of Python version of threading.RLock

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] usefulness of Python version of threading.RLock
• Next message: [Python-Dev] What's required to keep OS/2 support in Python 3.3
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> The yes/no answer is "No, we can't drop it".

Thanks, that's a clear answer :-)

> I'm not convinced of the benefits of removing the pure Python RLock
> implementation

Indeed.
As noted, this issue with signal handlers is more general, so this
wouldn't solve the problem at hand. I just wanted to know whether we
could remove this "duplicate" code, but since it might be used by some
implementations, it's best to keep it.

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] usefulness of Python version of threading.RLock
• Next message: [Python-Dev] What's required to keep OS/2 support in Python 3.3
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4