RetroSearch Browse

Sat Jan 7 14:13:23 CET 2012 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-January/115369.html

2012/1/7 Charles-François Natali <neologix at free.fr>:
> Thanks for those precisions, but I must admit it doesn't help me much...
> Can we drop it? A yes/no answer will do it ;-)

The yes/no answer is "No, we can't drop it".

Even though CPython no longer uses the Python version of RLock in
normal operation, it's still the reference implementation for everyone
else that has to perform the same task (i.e. wrap Python code around a
non-reentrant lock to create a reentrant one).

Cheers,
Nick.

-- 
Nick Coghlan   |   ncoghlan at gmail.com   |   Brisbane, Australia

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-January/115369.html below:

[Python-Dev] usefulness of Python version of threading.RLock