On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 10:28 PM, Jim Jewett <jimjjewett at gmail.com> wrote: > Given the wording requiring a real dictionary, I would have assumed > that it was OK (if perhaps not sensible) to do pointer arithmetic and > access the keys/values/hashes directly. (Though if the breakage was > between python versions, I would feel guilty about griping too > loudly.) > If you're going to be a language lawyer about it, I would simply point out that all the spec requires is that "type(env) is dict" -- it says nothing about how Python defines "type" or "is" or "dict". So, you're on your own with that one. ;-) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20120102/37f584ed/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4