On Sun, 01 Jan 2012 16:56:19 +0100 Christian Heimes <lists at cheimes.de> wrote: > Am 01.01.2012 05:11, schrieb Antoine Pitrou: > > On Sat, 31 Dec 2011 16:56:00 -0700 > > Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote: > >> ISTM the only reasonable thing is to have a random seed picked very early > >> in the process, to be used to change the hash() function of > >> str/bytes/unicode (in a way that they are still compatible with each other). > > > > Do str and bytes still have to be compatible with each other in 3.x? > > py3k has tests for hash("ascii") == hash(b"ascii"). Are you talking > about this invariant? Yes. It doesn't seem to have any point anymore. Regards Antoine.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4