On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 9:11 PM, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote: > On Sat, 31 Dec 2011 16:56:00 -0700 > Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote: > > ISTM the only reasonable thing is to have a random seed picked very early > > in the process, to be used to change the hash() function of > > str/bytes/unicode (in a way that they are still compatible with each > other). > > Do str and bytes still have to be compatible with each other in 3.x? > Hm, you're right, that's no longer a concern. (Though ATM the hashes still *are* compatible.) > Merry hashes, weakrefs and thread-local memoryviews to everyone! > :-) -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20111231/0f2d1b9f/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4