RetroSearch Browse

Wed Feb 29 15:28:56 CET 2012 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-February/117112.html

On Feb 29, 2012, at 07:30 AM, Yury Selivanov wrote:

>"""As it stands, Python 3 is currently a bad choice for long-term 
>investments, since the ecosystem is not yet properly developed, and 
>libraries are still fighting with their API decisions for Python 3."""
>
>to:
>
>"""As it stands, when chosing between 2.7 and Python 3.2, Python 3 
>is currently not the best choice for certain long-term investments, 
>since the ecosystem is not yet properly developed, and libraries are 
>still fighting with their API decisions for Python 3."""
>
>Could you just remove the statement completely?

If I read correctly, Nick is undertaking a rewrite of PEP 414, which should
help a lot.

-Barry

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-February/117112.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 414