RetroSearch Browse

Wed Feb 29 06:56:45 CET 2012 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-February/117100.html

Le 28/02/2012 13:48, Giampaolo Rodolà a écrit :
> Il 28 febbraio 2012 13:19, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> ha scritto:
>> IMO, maintaining two branches shouldn't be much more work than
>> maintaining hacks so that a single codebase works with two different
>> programming languages.
> 
> Would that mean distributing 2 separate tarballs?
> How would tools such as easy_install and pip work in respect of that?
> Is there a naming convention they can rely on?

Sadly, PyPI and the packaging tools don’t play nice with
non-single-codebase projects, so you have to use a different name for
your 3.x-compatible release, like “unittestpy3k”.  Some bdists include
the Python version in the file name, but sdists don’t.

Regards

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-February/117100.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 414 - Unicode Literals for Python 3