A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-February/117092.html below:

[Python-Dev] Backporting PEP 414

[Python-Dev] Backporting PEP 414 [Python-Dev] Backporting PEP 414Brian Curtin brian at python.org
Tue Feb 28 21:59:33 CET 2012
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 14:27, Ethan Furman <ethan at stoneleaf.us> wrote:
> Here's what I know:
>
> We don't add features to bug-fix releases.
> u'' is considered a feature.
> By not backporting to 3.1 and 3.2 we are not easing the migration pains from
> 2.x.

Let's say it's 2013 and 3.3 has been out for a few months and you want
to port your library to Python 3. Why would you worry about 3.1 or
3.2?

You certainly see why we're not worried about 3.0.
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4