2012/2/28 Ethan Furman <ethan at stoneleaf.us>: > Here's what I know: > > We don't add features to bug-fix releases. > u'' is considered a feature. > By not backporting to 3.1 and 3.2 we are not easing the migration pains from > 2.x. > > > Here's what I don't know: > > Why is readding u'' a feature and not a bug? (Just had a thought about this > -- because the removal of u'' is documented.) Because it's a new "thing" which doesn't fix obviously broken behavior. > > > If there is already a FAQ entry feel free to point me to it, but I would > still be curious why, in this instance, practicality does not beat purity? Because it's practical not to break bugfix releases with new features. -- Regards, Benjamin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4