RetroSearch Browse

Tue Feb 28 08:56:34 CET 2012 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-February/117035.html

On 28.2.2012 01:16, martin at v.loewis.de wrote:
> Armin, I propose that you correct the *factual* deficits of the PEP

He cannot, because he would have to throw away whole PEP ... it is all 
based on non-sensical concept of "native string". There is no such 
animal (there are only strings and bytes, although they are incorrectly 
named Unicode strings and strings in Python 2), and whole PEP is just "I 
don't like Python 3 and I want it to be reverted back to Python 2".

It doesn't matter anymore now, but I just needed to put it off my chest.

Matěj

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-February/117035.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 414 - Unicode Literals for Python 3