RetroSearch Browse

Mon Feb 27 23:38:14 CET 2012 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-February/117004.html

28.02.12 00:11, Armin Ronacher написав(ла):
> On 2/27/12 9:58 PM, R. David Murray wrote:
>> But the PEP doesn't address the unicode_literals plus str() approach.
>> That is, the rationale currently makes a false claim.
> Which would be exactly what that u() does not do?

No.

1. u() is trivial for Python 3 and relatively expensive (and doubtful 
for non-ascii literals) for Python 2, unicode_literals plus str() is 
trivial for Python 3 and cheap for Python 2.

2. Text strings are natural and prevalent, but "natural" strings are 
domain-specific and archaic.

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-February/117004.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 414 - Unicode Literals for Python 3