Martin v. Löwis wrote: > Am 26.02.2012 07:06, schrieb Nick Coghlan: >> On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 1:13 PM, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote: >>> A small quibble: I'd like to see a benchmark of a 'u' function implemented in C. >> Even if it was quite fast, I don't think such a function would bring >> the same benefits as restoring support for u'' literals. > > You claim that, but your argument doesn't actually support that claim > (or I fail to see the argument). Python 2.6 code: this = u'that' Python 3.3 code: this = u('that') Not source compatible, not elegant. (Even though 2to3 could make this fix, it's still kinda ugly.) ~Ethan~
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4