Zitat von Armin Ronacher <armin.ronacher at active-4.com>: > Hi, > > On 2/27/12 10:17 AM, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote: >> There are a few other unproven performance claims in the PEP. Can you >> kindly provide the benchmarks you have been using? In particular, I'm >> interested in the claim " In many cases 2to3 runs one or two orders of >> magnitude slower than the testsuite for the library or application it's >> testing." > The benchmarks used are linked in the PEP. Maybe I'm missing something, but there doesn't seem to be a benchmark that measures the 2to3 performance, supporting the claim that it runs "two orders of magnitude" slower (which I'd interpret as a factor of 100). If the claim actually cannot be supported, please remove it from the PEP. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4