RetroSearch Browse

Sun Feb 26 20:23:23 CET 2012 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-February/116893.html

> It would be nice to call it something else than "printf-style
> formatting". While it is certainly modelled on printf(), knowledge of C
> or printf is not required to understand %-style formatting, nor even to
> appreciate it.
>

+1. The section is already titled "old string formatting operations" so if
this name is acceptable it should be reused. If it's not, it should then be
consistently changed everywhere.

Eli
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20120226/3ee6fc96/attachment.html>

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-February/116893.html below:

[Python-Dev] cpython (3.2): Issue #14123: Explicitly mention that old style % string formatting has caveats